In Rochester, or "Sunny Roch," as the locals call it, the Devils and the Sabres skated to a 2-2 tie. Moving the game to Rochester, home of Buffalo's minor league affiliate, the Rochester Americans was the idea of new Sabres owner Thomas Golisano, and part of a campaign to >restore some regional pride to that part of Upstate New York. Maxim Afinogenov had the game-tying goal in the third period for Buffalo.
In Manhattan, Marc-Andre Fleury got hammered by the New York Rangers, giving up six goals on 42 shots in a 6-2 Rangers win. Mark Messier, off to another hot start, had the game winner for New York, his seventh of the season. Eric Lindros left the game in the first period with an eye injury, as did the Penguins Rico Fata, who injured a hamstring after colliding with Lindros.
Eric's return to the lineup was brief
In Chicago, Calgary jumped all over the Blackhawks, winning 6-2. Rookie Matthew Lombardi had a hat trick for Calgary, and goalie Jamie McLennan stopped 27 shots for Calgary.
In Dallas, the Red Wings won their second straight, blasting the Stars, 6-2. Steve Yzerman and Pavel Datsyuk had two goals a piece, and Dominik Hasek got his second straight victory in goal for Detroit. For more detail, check out On The Wings.
How much does Dallas miss Derian Hatcher? So much so, that puck moving defenseman Sergei Zubov is now -13 for the season. If only Stars owner Tom Hicks wasn't paying Alex Rodriguex all that money, he would have been able to afford to keep Hatcher in Dallas.
In Anaheim, the Ducks smacked the visiting Maple Leafs, 5-1. Sergei Fedorov had two goals, and J.S. Giguere 29 saves for the Ducks. Steve Ovadia thinks the Ducks may be turning it around.
Finally, here in Washington, the Capitals revived from their season long coma, and beat down the Hurricanes, 7-1. At one point in the third period, the Caps and the Hurricanes scored 4 goals in 1:16, a new NHL record. Robert Lang (who is finally playing up to his fat contract) had a hat trick, and Olie Kolzig 29 saves for the home team. But excuse Kolzig if he's refusing to get excited:
"I'm disappointed with where we're at, but I'm not going to get too excited about this win,'' Kolzig said. "We're in no position to be overconfident. We're a long way from where we want to be.''
In response to the team's woes, one of my readers says he's starting a new, "Save The Caps," campaign (scroll to the bottom of the box to find his entire post). In a comment to a post I left on October 31, Pat Malone had this to say:
With the NHL coming close to a possible lockout in September of 2004, a deep pall has been cast over the entire sport. Hockey is in trouble, but worst of all, once again, as a fan, my team is in trouble, yet once again.
I am going to officially propose that we, as Caps fans, do it again, and have a "Save the Caps II" campaign. Ted Leonsis has poured his money, heart and soul into this franchise. As fans of the sport it's the least we can do to support our team, through thick and thin.
If you're a Caps fan like I am, and you would like to support the effort to bring about a new version of the "Save the Caps" campaign, once again, please e-mail me at malonemarketing@aol.com.
Take care and "Let's go Caps!"
Good luck to Malone and anyone else who jumps on board.
UPDATE: Over at Hockey Pundits, John Campea doesn't think that increasing the size of the net would cure what ails the NHL:
Would scoring improve if the net size was increased? Yes, without a doubt it would. But the game would still be slow, boring and ground to a halt. The only difference is that 4 of the 20 shots per game would go in instead of the 2.5 per 20 shots that we see today.
As a matter of fact, if the nets were bigger, it would only encourage teams to lock down on their defense even more than it is today. If more shots are going in, then teams would focus on shutting down the shot total, and thus the "solution" only perpetuates the problems.
Does something need to be done about the state of the game? Yes, absolutely. But increasing the size of the nets will only leave us with an unsatisfying game with a final score of 5-3 instead of an unsatisfying game of 3-1, and all that ultimately accomplishes is decreasing the length of our nap times between goals. That's my two cents worth.
The Toronto Sun's Al Strachan has other ideas:
"...In today's NHL, there may be a half-dozen teams who are willing to get into a shootout. If two of those teams are facing each other, the result is usually entertaining. But there are 24 other teams whose primary aim is not to allow the first goal. They want to open the scoring and defend that precipitous lead...
So focused is their defensive approach that the half-dozen offensive teams can't open up against them and are forced to assume the same tactic. Should they fall behind against these defensively obsessed teams, they'll be checked into oblivion. Either way, the result is a borefest, with most coaches playing not to lose, rather than to win."
At USA Today, Ted Montgomery has published his annual list of overrated and underrated NHL players.
Thanks to Tom Benjamin for multiple links.
*CORRECTION: Originally, I had written that the Caps had scored 4 goals in 1:16.
This entry was posted
on Thursday, November 13th, 2003 at 7:04 am by Eric McErlain and is filed under Hockey.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Weight had a hook on Samsonov, and his other arm around Sergei’s body, and it was apparently legal. I mourn for the days of hockey when that would have been a penalty. There was no one else back and Samsonov would have had an empty net goal, making it 4-2 Boston, thereby killing off St. Louis’ rally.
Samsonov almost redeemed himself after the Blues coughed up the puck one too many times in overtime. Osgood made a ridiculous save on a one-timer from the bottom of the left circle, and Weight picked up the puck. The Bruins’ skaters seemed to just stop dead at that point, and Weight went end-to-end, uncontested, for the winning goal.