May 27th, 2004

Rink Notes

At first, I was really annoyed when I read this column by Newsday's Shaun Powell about the continuing woes of the NHL as a business -- after all, it is a pretty easy storyline. Then I read this report, that said ratings for Game One on ESPN were the worst they'd ever been for a broadcast of the Finals, and I remembered just how desperate things really are for the sport financially.

Frankly, I'd rather think of what's happening on the ice. Here's the Tampa Tribune's Erik Erlendsson on the Lightning's dilemma after Game One:

The Lightning said all the right things after capturing the Eastern Conference title, how they still had unfinished business, how they were going to be ready for the speedy Flames.

But all the video work in the world, no matter how many times you watch it, can't prepare you for game speed. Seeing the Flames up close and personal, seeing how quickly they are on top of you, how they challenge everything was like watching an instructional video on how to swim and then dropping to the bottom of the pool the first time you venture into the water.

OK, so you're John Tortorella: what do you do?

1) Ask your team to focus, and keep with the gameplan;
2) Ditch the gameplan and open things up, thinking the less offensively talented Flames won't be able to handle the superior firepower on your top two lines?
3) Ditch the gameplan completely, and give the Flames a taste of their own medicine, adopting their forechecking tactics in an attempt to create the kind of turnovers the Lightning regularly created in the first three rounds of the torunament?

My guess is Tortorella won't panic. He'll stick with what's gotten him here -- at least for one game. If not for a fortuitous bounce, and one all-world play by Jarome Iginla, Game One would have been 1-0 headed into the third period.

One other thing to consider -- the ice in Tampa is really soft. Maybe Tortorealla asks management to turn up the heat and make the ice even softer -- something that might hurt the faster Flames.

4 Responses to “Rink Notes”

  1. Ninja says:

    I think characterizing the Flames as faster is incorrect. Their play made them seem faster, but the Bolts were never in stride. If the Bolts can sneak through and punish the Calgary forecheck with a few quick goals, the Flames will appear to have lead skates…..atleast for a shift or two.

  2. Tyler says:

    43 percent humidity in Tampa today…

    I think that Tortorella has to match up lines more tonight than he did in Game One. And I bet he will.

    Unrelated: No French Open posts? Not even about Serena Williams’ apparent breast reduction surgery?

  3. tommy says:

    I think Torts sticks with the gameplan for at least one more game. If it doesn’t work, then they will be desperate, and move on to your plan 2.

  4. Ninja says:

    Serena’s tits shrunk?!!!!!

    Heavens to Betsy! (whatever that means)

May 26th, 2004

Rink Notes

If losing the opening game of the Stanley Cup Finals weren't enough, Tampa Bay defenseman Dan Boyle's evening took a turn for the worse last night when he discovered a fire had caused about $300,000 damage ($U.S.) to his Tampa home.

Back in the Tampa Bay locker room, many of Rick Dudley's friends from his time as Tampa Bay GM were shocked at the news of his firing from the GM post with their cross-state rivals. Meanwhile, las Panteras made it official -- Keenan and Martin are in as GM and head coach next season.

Here's Chris Corrigan from the Hockey Pundits:

The game means more here in Canada than it does in Tampa Bay. I don't buy the "pillaging" argument, but it is not too much of a stretch to say that this series is being taken entirely differently on either side of the border.

In the NBA or the NFL the Championship is the Championship. In the NHL it's very market dependant. If it wasn't for the fact that there was a Canadian team in the finals, hockey would be on it's deathbed right now. If San Jose had won the West, thirty people would have been following the final.

Indeed, more folks in Calgary might care right now when it comes to the Stanley Cup Finals. But know this, a win by the Bolts would do a lot more to cement the future of the NHL South of the Mason-Dixon line, and virtually guarantee that the Lightning will continue to be a going concern in Tampa. Just ask the ownership groups in Dallas and Denver.

At a press conference before last night's game, Commissioner Gary Bettman was rattling the management sabre.

Earlier today, I said team speed was the critical factor in Calgary's win last night. Steve Ovadia thinks it goes deeper -- it was all about joy. ESPN's crew weighs in here.

2 Responses to “Rink Notes”

  1. Aaron says:

    Beaten by the flames twice in an evening must be tough.

  2. tommy says:

    Very odd coincidence. Lightning vs. Flames and an electrical fire. Weird.

Leave a Reply

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

May 25th, 2004

Rink Notes

Over at About.com, Jamie Fitzpatrick has uncovered an epidemic of Florida-bashing on the eve of the Stanley Cup Finals. Does anybody remember this kind of silliness when Dallas won the Cup in 1999?

Here's ESPN.com's Terry Frei in response:

But the deal is -- seriously, folks -- that unless the NHL is going to try to turn back the clock four decades, everyone needs to get past this chauvinistic attitude about, ahem, "non-traditional" markets making the finals.

It gets old. Even older than Dave Andreychuk.

Here, here. Thanks to the Hockey Pundits for the link.

Steve Ovadia got a good look at the Jarome Iginla action figure, and has found a significant flaw.

NHL2Night might be gone forever, but thankfully, John Buccigross is still with us.

A little less than a year after dumping Mike Keenan from behind the bench, it looks like the Panthers actually want to bring him back in order to replace deposed GM Rick Dudley. If things hold to form, we should expect the Panthers to be the surprise Eastern Conference entry in the 2007 Stanley Cup Finals.

The Czechs and the Finns have named their World Cup rosters.

4 Responses to “Rink Notes”

  1. There was minor silliness toward Dallas in ’99, but not nearly as bad as the anti-Carolina/anti-Southern venom in ’02. The ’04 anti-TB press doesn’t seem as intense as that was, but perhaps I’m just more sensitive to the ’02 shenanigans (on both fronts).

    I don’t think you’d see as much anti-Lightning press if they weren’t playing a Canadian team — I don’t recall Florida getting hit in ’96 for anything other than their tendency to throw rats after a Panther goal. Calgary winning the West has turned this into another Canada vs. USA proxy battle, and I think any post-’74-expansion US-based team would be getting similar disdain.

  2. Ben says:

    Is any of this as bad as the Canada/Toronto bashing the first time the Jays played in the World Series?

  3. I don’t remember much Canada-bashing in ’92 (other than the USMC color guard in Atlanta somehow managing to present the Maple Leaf upside down, which was pretty dumb), but I was only 12 at the time, so it very well could have been there. But whatever may have happened then, I sure heard enough redneck/NASCAR/country music cracks in ’02 to make up for it. The only guy north of the St. Lawrence — hell, one of maybe five people north of the Mason-Dixon Line in either country! — willing to stand up for my fellow Caniacs was His Über-Canadianness himself, Don Cherry.

    I actually kinda like the USA/Canada subtext to this year’s final — I think it makes it more interesting to the casual fan than San Jose-Tampa Bay would have been, though ESPN/ABC may disagree with me.

  4. CT says:

    The anti-Florida bashing has been going on since Round 1 vs. the Isles, and manifested itself partly in the expectation that the Bolts were going to be upset in every series they were in. But I can’t say it’s been overwhelming; from my vantage point here in the Bay area, it’s just one more thing to poke at.

Leave a Reply

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

May 10th, 2004

Rink Notes

Congratulations to Team Canada, who took the gold medal in the World Championships with a 5-3 win over Sweden this weekend. Jeff and Alanah are celebrating. The U.S. secured the Bronze with a 1-0 shootout win over Slovakia on Sunday. The real hero for Team USA was Edmonton Oilers goalie Ty Conklin, who went undefeated in the tournament at 4-0-1, and helped the U.S. qualify for the final round in the 2006 Olympics in Turin.

Over at The Hockey Pundits, Chris McAlonan is doing a great job with his capsule reivews of the Flyers-Bolts series.

Over the weekend, lots of folks pointed to this Larry Brooks piece pointing the fingers at the owners in the CBA dispute. While I can understand the folks who are inclined to call ownership a pack of liars due to their negotiating position, I don't think we should fool ourselves into thinking that a negotiation between billionaires (owners) and millionaires (players) has anything to do with a traditional labor/management dispute. Taking sides in this dispute is a lot like taking sides in the contract negotiations between NBC and the cast of Friends.

PJ at Sharkspage took his camera to Sunday's San Jose-Calgary game, and he's promised me an all-babe gallery for Game Two.

Did I ever mention how much I love Sharkspage?

The story of Mike Danton just gets sadder, as evidence of the complete control his agent exercises over his whole life become more apparent everyday. Danton seems so in the thrall of his agent, that I have to wonder if a trial will even get us nearer to the truth.

One Response to “Rink Notes”

  1. Skip Oliva says:

    Here’s a telling paragraph from Brooks’s column:

    “This CBA negotiation isn’t about ensuring competitive balance or maintaining the integrity of the league. We have that now. The owners could care less. This move for a hard cap is a money grab, nothing more and nothing less. It’s a money grab by some of the wealthiest individuals and corporations in North America that’s designed to double or triple the value of their franchises. It’s about the arrogance and greed of the wealthy and powerful; that’s what this is about. Those are the contemptible concepts over which Bettman and his hawks are preparing to cancel next season.”

    Brooks fails to mention, not surprisingly, the fact that the players’ union–like every other union in the U.S.–holds monopoly bargaining power, and that unions, like owners, are equally susceptible to “greed.” Brooks’s argument is that the owners are wealthy enough, and are wrong to seek a hard-cap that would only make them wealthier. But the wealthy don’t stay wealthy by continuing to invest in failed business models. At the end of the day, it’s not the union that owns the league, it’s the owners.

    That said, I share Brooks’s antipathy for a hard-cap in the NHL. What concerns me is that a hard-cap has never been tried before in a league with a well-developed minor league system. Frankly, I don’t think the two ideas can co-exist peacefully.

    The basic cause of the NHL’s current economic problem is inflation. The owners essentially printed paper currency by handing out expansion franchises without first ensuring a proper “hard base”–i.e. fan support and adequate infrastructure–existed. The result was massive inflation of player salaries. Imposing a hard-cap won’t fix this. If anything, it will make it worse. You don’t curb inflation by imposing wage and price controls.

    One problem with professional sports leagues is that teams are not allowed to fail, because league offices and politicians will always step-in with subsidies to protect failing franchises. If you look back at the early days of most pro leagues–especially the NFL–you’ll see a great deal of fluctuation in the number and location of franchises. It took the NFL about twenty years to stabilize a core number of teams. And of course the NHL remained at six teams for several decades before leaping into expansion. The problem today is that sports franchises come with political (i.e. taxpayer) support, which means failure is not an acceptable option. Look what happened when baseball, quite reasonably, tried to contract the Expos and Twins.

Leave a Reply

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

May 6th, 2004

Rink Notes

We've got to wait how many more days before the start of the Conference Finals? I guess it will be good practice for next season, when we don't know if we'll get to watch much hockey at all.

The Tampa Tribune's Martin Fennelly is getting a little uncomfortable with the playoff success the Lightning has been enjoying thus far. But when you play the seventh and eighth seeds in your conference in the first two rounds of the playoffs, success like this shouldn't exactly be unexpected. Then again, when you finish first in the your conference, you're expected to capitalize on your good fortune with performances like the ones the Bolts have put in.

Pat Quinn, who has one year remaining on his contract in Toronto, will be back as head coach of the Leafs next season. BTW -- great seats are still available at the Air Canada Centre. Though I'm shocked, it looks like Tony Granato will get to keep his job in Colorado too. And in Florida, the Panthers talked to ex-Sens coach Jacques Martin about the head coaching job there, though management says interim head coach John Torchetti is still the frontrunner.

Out in Vancouver, the Canucks are expected to announce that Dave Nonis will be their new general manager. Tom Benjamin is still angry about all of this, and he's got a right to be. Tom also talks about the hockey most of North America isn't watching, the World Championships, and Hockey Rodent has a report on Team USA's surprising victory over the hometown Czechs.

On The Wings has shaken off post playoff depression, and is looking to the future on the blueline.

And in case you missed it, St. Louis Blues forward Mike Danton was extradited to Illinois to face charges in that alleged murder for hire plot that still lacks a target with a name. The plea was not guilty. Danton's agent, David Frost, just talked with the AP, and claimed that Danton was delusional and under the influence of painkillers and sleeping pills when he arranged the alleged contract hit.

In happier news, the AP has caught up with former NHL coach Kevin Constantine. Looks like somebody has found a home in the WHL.

Leave a Reply

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

May 4th, 2004

Rink Notes

Vancouver Canucks Op Ed isn't happy with Orca Bay's decision to let Brian Burke find a new job. They're right to be upset, as Burke will almost certainly have another team on the brink of a Cup sometime in the next few seasons. The Canucks clearly would have been right there if not for the Bertuzzi incident.

Want to beat David Aebischer? Here's how PJ at Sharkspage says you can do it:

San Jose will need to pile bodies in front of the crease and aim high, preferably blocker side. Getting big goalies moving side-to-side will open up the five hole.

Meanwhile, remember how Sharks head coach Ron Wilson called out a number of players after their OT loss to Colorado in Game Five. Looks like Sharks defenseman Mike Rathje is a little annoyed with Wilson:

"I just gave them the puck, basically, from what I hear" from the coach, Rathje said after practice, declining to discuss the play in greater detail. "I'm not going to focus on one play out there. It's a 60-minute game, a 25-guy team."

Rathje has been the only Sharks skater on the ice for the three Colorado goals that have brought the Avalanche to within one win of San Jose entering today's Game 6 in Denver.

Back East, there's joy in Philadelphia, as it looks like Robert Esche will start Game Six tonight in Toronto. Though Flyers head coach Ken Hitchcock reported that Esche was suffering from "flu-like symptoms" that resulted in him being pulled from Game Five, most folks are acknowledging that Esche probably suffered some sort of head injury during Game Four. Last night on ESPN, there was open speculation that the Flyers would be reluctant to report that Esche has suffered a concussion, as league rules would mandate that Esche be held off the ice for at least one week before returning.

Puts the whole Eric Lindros/Flyers saga in a different light now, doesn't it?

Up in Toronto, Mike Ulmer of the Toronto Sun is pretty fatalistic:

MAYBE YOU remember the conflicts facing characters from high school English: Man versus man, man versus himself? I ask because the greatest obstacle facing the Maple Leafs is not the big, hard-skating Philadelphia Flyers.

The Leafs' greatest hurdle is the little voice lurking inside each player that says: "Why bother? There's already enough pain in the world. Why go looking for more?"

I understand what he's talking about. Unfortunately, the Leafs play will only reinforce this notion, as I predict they will win tonight, only to lose Game Seven in Philly later this week.

4 Responses to “Rink Notes”

  1. Ninja says:

    I would be shocked and amazed if the Flyers tried to pull another playoff stunt that has already cost them several $ million and one player a supposedly forced early retriement. But then again, it is the Flyers.

  2. Ninja says:

    I would be shocked and amazed if the Flyers tried to pull another playoff stunt that has already cost them several $ million and one player a supposedly forced early retriement. But then again, it is the Flyers.

  3. Tyler Green says:

    When YOUR turnovers in TWO straight games lead to TWO game-winning goals, perhaps that’s a good time to:

    A) Realize that you gave them the puck (and not just “basically”; and
    B) That you should focus on it.

  4. dcthrowback says:

    I thought they were going to win, too. Took some heart coming back…too bad they couldn’t finish it in regulation. Oh well.

Leave a Reply

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree