Archive for 43. week of 2005

October 29th, 2005

Beliveau: Falling In Love Again For The First Time

The former Montreal Canadiens great likes what he sees so far:

The "new" National Hockey League reminds Jean B
 
October 28th, 2005

The Million Dollar Kick

From ESPN.com:

It didn't win a Super Bowl, but it was certainly life-changing kick.

During halftime of Thursday night's CFL game between the Hamilton Tiger Cats and the Toronto Argonauts, Brian Diesbourg, a 25-year-old engineer from Belle River, Ontario, kicked a 50-yard field goal to win $1 million.

As JABS pointed out earlier yesterday, contests like these have become pretty common. Heck, I even had my shot at glory once.

 
October 27th, 2005

An End To Holding On Kick Returns?

I know I've never been a big fan of Jason Whitlock, but I think this is one idea of his that has some merit:

5. Next season the NFL should change its kickoff rules and allow blockers on the receiving team to hold, as long as it's the front of the jersey.

Too many kickoff returns are ruined by holding penalties when the holding really has no impact on the return. Kickoff returns can be one of the most exciting plays in football.

Today's professional football players move too fast -- especially on kickoffs and punts -- for middle-aged referees to keep pace with the action. The refs are simply guessing on a lot of holding calls.

It's very difficult to hold on kickoffs. The players are moving too fast, the jerseys are too tight. A defender who allows himself to be held on kick coverage is doing a poor job.

Here's hoping the league's competition committee gives this idea some serious consideration.

 
October 27th, 2005

Bertuzzi Returns To Denver

What's going to happen tonight when Todd Bertuzzi takes the ice at the Pepsi Center in Denver for the first time since his assault on former Colorado Avalanche forward Steve Moore? If you listen to the CBC, the reception ought to be pretty hostile, with the prospect of violence.

If you're Gary Mason from the Globe and Mail, the hit is all ancient history:

The sentiment inside Brooklyn's, a slap shot away from the Pepsi Center, seems to support Mulcaly's contention. People are expecting a spirited affair between the two teams, but mostly because the Avs and Canucks always have them -- not because Bertuzzi's in town.

It's almost as if fans in Denver have taken their cue from Avalanche players, who have said for weeks now that it's time the incident was forgotten and everyone moved on. Obviously, if the attack had happened two weeks ago, then tonight's game would be entirely different. And if this Colorado team more closely resembled the prelockout one that played Vancouver that spring night, it might be different, too. And there is another fact that fans here acknowledge.

"Honestly," James Benton said. "I think Steve Moore has been forgotten. I know that sounds bad but it's true. You know, he wasn't here long and hasn't been seen much since and he just hasn't remained in people's consciousness.

But while some folks are up for forgetting, Terry Frei at the Denver Post has other ideas:

What has the sport learned? Answer: Not much. Other than that players shouldn't talk about plans for vengeance in front of cameras or tape recorders, leaving an audio and video trail for lawyers.

Second issue: How has the culture of the game been affected? Answer: Not at all.

It's absolutely true the players have put it behind them - and the Avalanche even more so than the Canucks.

To varying degrees, Vancouver has been reminded of it at every stop, or every newsworthy juncture in Bertuzzi's passage through legal and league disciplinary processes.

With Moore gone, the Avs have forgotten the anger they felt that night in Vancouver and the shock they felt the next morning when they saw Moore in the hospital.

It is further confirmation that there is a caste system in their sport.

It has showed up at every step along the way in this saga, starting when the Canucks originally were livid that a marginal forward (Moore) knocked a star (Markus Naslund), who was caught with his head down, out of the lineup for three games with an unpenalized hit.

Three weeks later, a perfect storm of volatile circumstances struck that night in Vancouver, when Bertuzzi coldcocked Moore from behind, pile-drove him into the ice and was preparing to hit him again when Andrei Nikolishin grabbed Bertuzzi's arm.

Funny enough, it was only a few months ago that Tom Benjamin wrote about how the salary cap could drive a wedge between teammates forced to compete for salary cash from the same restricted pot. But if anything, it's the actions in and around the Bertuzzi incident that show that wedge already existed between the superstars and the pluggers in the NHL.

After all, what's the big deal if one more spare part disappears from the game, right?

No, wrong. As wrong as can be. For more, check out this feature from the AP.

 
October 27th, 2005

Sportblog Roundup #1

Over in the U.K., the Militant Moderates are starting up another sport blog roundup. Looks like the premier will be on November 8. Send your submissions to sportblog-at-googlemail-dot-com.

 
October 27th, 2005

Yanks Lock Up Brian Cashman For Another 3 Years

That's the news out of New York, released not too long ago. Here in D.C., there were some hopes that Cashman, who attended Catholic University in the District, might bolt the Bronx for a chance at running the Nats. Too bad it didn't happen.

As far as I was concerned, after watching reaction shots from Cashman during the playoffs for the past few seasons, I was hoping he'd escape from the clutches of George Steinbrenner just for the sake of his health.

 
October 27th, 2005

The Lot Of The Scholar Athlete

Back in the waning days of the Summer, it came to light that USC quarterback Matt Leinart's course load for his final semester at the school was a little bit light, considering it consisted of nothing but a two-credit course in ballroom dancing to complete his demanding degree in Sociology.

The dogged Sports Prof is not impressed:

Now, listen, Matt Leinart represents a lot of what's good in the college sports world, the formerly awkward kid with bad feet who has blossomed into an all-world athlete and potentially a very wealthy man. He deserves kudos for his play on the field, and I'll be among the first to say that.

What he doesn't deserve is praise for his decision to remain in college.

And what he certainly doesn't deserve is any mention as a scholar-athlete.

Because, in this case, he's just an athlete at a college.

And, this year, not a scholar at all.

Which would mean that Leinart is merely following in the footsteps of thousands of other college athletes for whom classes were a minor irritant over the course of their academic careers.

After all, while USC is a serious institution of higher learning, it's one that has decided to field a semi-professional football team to help market itself. There's nothing wrong with that, and if Leinart wanted to take advantage of the rules to avoid being regularly manhandled like a sack of potatoes behind San Francisco's offensive line, more power to him.

Now, does that mean we shouldn't admire those true scholar athletes who manage to juggle a starting spot on any squad as well as excel in the classroom? Of course not, and that's why they still award something called the Academic All-American across every college sport.

Now, is it a travesty of NCAA rules that any player is allowed to compete on the field of play while living a life of relative luxury? Maybe, but as I've written many times, NCAA rules are designed to protect member institutions from each other, rather than enfore some sort of Platonian ideal of intercollegiate competition.

 
October 26th, 2005

Sheryl Swoopes Comes Out

ESPN: The Magazine (as opposed to ESPN: The Empire, oh please...) got today's big scoop in the form of an interview with WNBA MVP Sheryl Swoopes where she announces her exit from the closet:

"My reason for coming out isn't to be some sort of hero," Swoopes, a forward with the Houston Comets, says in the article. "I'm just at a point in my life where I'm tired of having to pretend to be somebody I'm not. I'm tired of having to hide my feelings about the person I care about. About the person I love.

"Male athletes of my caliber probably feel like they have a lot more to lose than gain [by coming out]. I don't agree with that. To me, the most important thing is happiness."

First of all, good for Swoopes. It's ridiculous that she had to hide in the first place, and I'm glad she's happy.

My friend Robert George has a question though:

I will be interested to hear what my friend Eric McErlain has to say about this from the various marketing perspectives: The WNBA has always tried to balance its marketing between its recognized lesbian audience and the "traditional" American-pie family; will the news make league executives nervous?

First of all, I want to make it clear that I don't make it a habit to talk to WNBA executives, and I doubt that I'll ever make it to their speed dial either. So what follows is just conjecture.

In short, I think this is a one-day story. The WNBA season is over, and even inside the Women's Hoops community, the focus these days is getting ready for the 2005-06 NCAA season. After all, this isn't the mid-1970s, and Swoopes isn't Martina Navratilova.

But while that's the short-term look, the league still has a longer-term problem that's only tangentially related to today's news -- and that's the fact that they are, at least in part, marketing to the wrong people.

Say what you want about Bill Simmons and Jay Mohr. Call them ignorant and bigoted if you like (though on this issue, I think the word juvenille is probably more appropriate), but the broadsides they've unloaded on the WNBA are the predictable result of trying to sell a product to a target audience that's not buying the sales job.

In short, they feel they're being assaulted (for whatever reason), and they don't want to be bothered anymore. We shouldn't exactly be surprised, after all, time and time again we talk about how feedback loops are more open and immediate than ever before. What Simmons and Mohr have done is heard the league's sales pitch, and instead of buying tickets and watching games, have told the league to leave them alone.

The league ought to listen, feel free to ignore folks like them, and look for ticket sales and television viewers in more hospitable climes. I think they'd be better off.

UPDATE: For more visit Deadspin and Women's Hoops.

 
October 26th, 2005

A Glaring Omission

From WashingtonCaps.com:

When Alex Ovechkin left the Capitals
 
October 25th, 2005

What Is Ozzie Guillen Thinking?

I watched the bulk of Game One and Two of the World Series from bars, so I wasn't paying close enough attention to see whether or not I should agree with Colby Cosh's assesment of Chicago White Sox manager Ozzie Guillen:

What I'll remember about World Series Game 1: the Sox get runners on first and second to lead off the home half of the 5th. Carl Everett, the Chicago DH, is up. And--yes, you guessed it--Ozzie Guillen orders him to bunt. Maybe there are one or two other managers crazy enough to issue such an order to Everett, but only Guillen would throw away his #5 hitter in order to (a) open up first base for Aaron Rowand and (b) set up the inning-ending double play with the slothlike Pierzynski coming up behind...

I kept waiting for Jon Miller and Joe Morgan to say something about it on ESPN Radio, but they never got further than mentioning that it was Everett's first sacrifice hit of the year. (No kidding, was it really, guys?) How many innings can a manager afford to give away like this before it catches up with him?

But just a few minutes ago, I did get to see Guillen up close, and I'm shaking my head now too. With one on and one out in the top of the fifth and Chicago down by three, White Sox starter John Garland came to the plate and Guillen asked him to bunt. This same John Garland has a career total of 12 ABs.

In April, this move would be defensible. But in October, it's near madness. Why Guillen didn't call for a pinch hitter I'll never know, but it looks like the move might pay off anyway as the Sox have taken a 5-4 lead.

It must be destiny.

UPDATE: It should be clear by now that nothing, not even Guillen's brainless decision-making can stop Chicago from winning it all.

 
October 25th, 2005

Freddie Will Be Ready On Sunday

D.C. United took a step forward towards resolving the Freddie Adu kerfuffle as it lifted the kid's suspension so he'll be eligible to play in Sunday's match against the Chicago Fire at RFK.

As for the team, they're saying everything is hunky dory now:

"As far as the club is concerned, this issue is behind us and we're eagerly awaiting Sunday's game," United spokesman Doug Hicks said yesterday. "He will train all week and we expect him to be available for Sunday."

So for now, everybody wins: The team (front office and coaching staff) made its point; Team Adu delivered its message to United and MLS; and under the theory that there is no such thing as bad publicity, the press gave some ink to MLS while the NFL, the World Series and the return of the NHL were previously dominating conversation.

Here's another question, that I'm not sure I know the answer to: Would it be better for Adu's development to leave United for another club? It seems clear that Team Adu is convinvced that it couldn't be any worse than it is now in Washington, which is probably why they were squawking in the first place.

POSTSCRIPT: I was at United's regular season finale two weeks ago against Columbus, and like DCenters, couldn't help but notice the horrible condition of the pitch -- the predictable result of having to share a stadium with a baseball team.

I don't know about anybody else, but seeing that really bugs me, and couldn't help but remind me of my trip to MLS Cup '99 in Foxboro where the pitch was clearly burned out. If there is a better indicator of Soccer's place in the American sports landscape, I'm not sure what it is (though We Call It Soccer has another suggestion).

As far as I'm concerned, the new stadium for the Nationals can't get built fast enough. As for the plans for a new stadium for United, I'll believe it when I'm standing inside of it. And in fact, I'd be more than happy to see them stay at RFK after the Nats depart, even if it means forgoing a new stadium altogether.

 
October 25th, 2005

The Biggios Get A Bad Turn

Long Island-native Craig Biggio is known around the majors as a class act, which makes this report all the more infuriating:

Chicago White Sox manager Ozzie Guillen apologized after Houston Astros second baseman Craig Biggio's wife was slapped by a male fan in Chicago.

The incident happened Sunday night in the stands at US Cellular Field, where the White Sox beat Houston in Game 2 of the World Series.

Biggio said his wife, Patty, wasn't hurt. He said the fan slapped his wife then tried to run away -- before the player's brother-in-law ended up "putting him against the wall."

Astros manager Phil Garner said that the fan had been bothering her for a while -- pulling Patty Biggio's hair and jostling her.

As always, please refer to section 8 of the manifesto. No criminal charges have been filed, but I like the solution suggested by Guillen:

"I told the police, 'Don't put him in jail, bring him to me in the dugout,"' Guillen said. "Hopefully, that won't happen again."

While he can be an absolute lunatic, that Guillen is my kind of manager.

 
October 25th, 2005

Thanks, But No Thanks Mr. Glauber

Hey, fellow followers of Gang Green, Newsday's Bob Glauber is aiming to ease our pain after last night's loss in Atlanta:

Jets fans, you're just going to have to live with this one.

You're going to have to understand that there will be seasons like this, that stuff happens that's so over-the-top ridiculous, you can only laugh while you sit helplessly as the football world around you collapses under the weight of one misfortune after another.

Seasons like this? Do we really need him to explain a history that's written in our bones? Do we need to lay on Dr. Glauber's couch to wrestle with the serial frustrations caused by names like Al Woodall, Matt Robinson, Browning Nagle, Frank Reich, Bubby Brister, Rick Mirer and now Brooks Bollinger?

Has this man forgotten that we're only nine years removed from back-to-back 3-13 and 1-15 seasons?

I better stop now.

 
October 24th, 2005

Just What Game Are We Watching, Redux

Tom Benjamin is cruching some numbers, and he's asking some questions:

Anyway, here are a few of the interesting numbers comparing the distribution of goals through the first 111 games to the distribution in 2003-04:

# As everyone knows goals are up. Without removing shootout goals, the numbers are now 6.26 GPG this year, compared to 5.14 two years ago.

I'm a little surprised Tom is making this allowance, as if I were crunching the numbers, I wouldn't count shootout goals at all.

# The most common score in both seasons is 3-2, but that score is a lot more popular this season. Nearly a quarter (23.4%) of the games this year have finished at 3-2. In 2003-04, 16.7% games finished at 3-2 or 2-2.

# Much has been made of the fact that there are more stirring comebacks this season. This is a good thing because the number of big leads and blowouts is also way up. We've already had 10 games (9%) won by five goals or more and 19 (17.1%) won by four or more. In 2003-04, there were only 60 games (5%) all year decided by five goals or more and 149 (12.1%) decided by four.

# Obviously there are also fewer close games. In 2003-04 51% of the games were tied or decided by one goal. That's dropped to 47%. In 2003-04, more than 70% of games were decided by 2 goals or less. So far this year, 66% of the games have been close.

None of this is very surprising, but it should serve to remind us all that for every positive delivered up by a rule change, there's a negative. Does a wide open 7-3 game sell better than a tight 2-1 game? Is it more entertaining?

I'd say yes to that question -- especially if the new rules allow a more talented team to impose its will on squads that took full advantage of the epidemic of clutching and grabbing that ended in 2003-04.

As I've said many times before, I think it's too early to tell just how successful the changes we've seen are until we get a little later into the regular season -- something I told Joe Tasca on his "Hockey Talk" radio show on Sunday morning (audio file on its way).

In short, I think there's a lot of tinkering to come. If anything, I would think that what we'd like to see is something of what Mark Cuban has proposed for basketball: To see a game played in October officiated exactly the same way a game is officiated during the playoffs. Will it happen right away? Not a chance. Might it not happen at all? More than likely.

 
October 24th, 2005

Sharkspage On Sumo!

That PJ is pretty handy with the camera.

 
October 24th, 2005

A Scots Earthquake

For more years than most who follow international soccer can remember, Scottish football has been a matter of Rangers and Celtic and Celtic and Rangers, with the rest of the SPL (and its predecessors) being nothing more but chum for the Old Firm.

But that had looked to be changing this year, as Hearts of Midloathian jumped out to an early lead in this year's table. But as much of a surprise as that's been, there was a bigger surprise in store on Saturday when head coach George Burley abruptly left the club due to differences with its new millionaire owner, Vladimir Romanov.

It looks like the club is pursuing Sir Bobby Robson as a replacement. As of today, Hearts stand three points clear of Celtic and seven of Rangers in the SPL.

 
October 24th, 2005

The Trouble About Tom Poti

Jim at Hockeybird is talking of the troubled Tom Poti:

There have been abundant rumors that Poti might be dealt, but it seems as if there are few buyers out there for a $2.36 million dollar defenseman that isn't great defensively and only has a couple of assists in eight games. As Larry Brooks points out in his NY Post article today, it might prove virtually impossible to move Poti at that price, especially since "the Blueshirts didn't get so much as a nibble on him during the Deadline Purge of '03."

I always subscribe to the theory of "where there is smoke, there is fire", and unfortunately for Poti, there are reasons why there are no bidders for him, and there are reasons why fans in both of the only two cities in which he has played despise him.

I wonder if when Poti left Boston University he ever thought he was on his way to becoming the Ed Whitson of the NHL.

 
October 24th, 2005

Got A Sense Of Humor?

Some new ads from the milk industry have rattled some cages at Major League Baseball:

The latest "Got Milk?" commercial hit a little too close to home for Major League Baseball. Poking fun at the league's steroid scandal, the television ad for the California Milk Processor Board talks about a player getting pulled from a game "after testing positive for a performance-enhancing substance."

In the next scene, a coach pulls a carton of milk from the slugger's locker.

"There is nothing humorous about steroid abuse," said Tim Brosnan, executive vice president for business for the league. "I would think that the California Milk Processor Board and their advertising agency would know better regarding an issue that threatens America's youth."

To watch the offending ads, click here. Primary assist to Ad Rag and Leslie Burns.

 
October 24th, 2005

Adieu DC United, Or Much Adu About Nothing?

Now that we've disposed with all of the cute Freddie Adu headlines that could also double as the close to a Rocky and Bullwinkle cartoon, it's time to dissect the mess in Washington that Adu, D.C. United and MLS have made of this kid's career in professional soccer.

By now, many of you already know of what at first blush might have seemed like an ill-advised interview that Adu granted to Washington Post beat writer Steven Goff complaining about his lack of playing time at American Soccer's most storied franchise, and his subsequent suspension by United head coach Peter Novak for Friday night's playoff game between D.C. and the Chicago Fire when he declined to apologize for it.

And whether or not Adu plays for United again is anybody's guess.

So much for the preliminaries.

But while I was watching Eric Wynalda try to parcel out some advice to Adu on ESPN2 on Sunday afternoon, I couldn't help but be struck by how this is all just an elaborate sideshow.

After all, we have journalists and commentators acting as if Adu is just like any other spoiled 16-year old. Which means they're asking us to forget that this particular 16-year old is banking millions, and has a virtual army of advisors telling him what to do.

So when you hear somebody saying that Adu is simply acting his age, don't believe it for a second. Plenty of folks have millions of dollars invested in this kid and his career. And if he isn't getting on the pitch regularly and scoring goals, those agents and sponsors aren't going to be happy. So if you're looking for a culprit in this contrived mess, why not go knocking on the door of Richard Motzkin, Adu's agent? Unfortunately, it looks like he isn't answering the phone:

Richard Motzkin, Adu's Los Angeles-based agent, did not return phone calls.

That's ok, as Adu's mother has made it perfectly clear that she's in her son's corner as Motzkin stays silent.

It would probably be good to remember that it was only three months ago that Alexi Lalas, former U.S. international and current GM of the Metrostars, mentioned that he'd be interested in bringing Adu to New York. By the way, who's Lalas's agent?

If you said Motzkin, you're right. Gee, I wonder if Lalas floated that idea by his agent before he talked with the New York Times?

Unfortunately for United and MLS, Adu really holds all the cards here. Say he continues to refuse to apologize, and gets suspended for the remainder of the season. Whether or not United repeat as MLS champs, it will matter little to Adu. After all, he can simply say he refuses to return to D.C. United, and the league will have little choice but to move him to another club in the league (easy enough in the single entity MLS, where New York is already the preferred destination) or sell him to a club overseas.

But here's another problem. You see, Adu (and his minions) wants to be on the world stage as soon as possible. If he stays with United, that means getting a berth with the U.S. Men's National Team that's heading to Germany next Summer.

But just because Adu is an American citizen now, doesn't mean that he has to play for the U.S. in international competition at the very highest levels. In fact, because he hasn't made an appearance with the Men's team at the international level (though he has competed with other under-21 squads), Adu could simply fly to England, gain citizenship there, and represent the birthplace of the beautiful game instead. All it would require would be a waiver from FIFA that he's be sure to get.

Don't think that National Team head coach Bruce Arena doesn't understand this. His statements this past week were a simple wake-up call to the folks at MLS to get their house in order when it comes to Adu and his playing time.

So if the American soccer kingpins really want to show Adu who's boss, Adu may very well wind up checkmating them in the end. Besides, the aim of the folks who run MLS is to fill their stadiums, and have their league seen as a respectable outfit on the world football scene. And having Adu wearing the Red, White and Blue at World Cup 2010, 2014, 2018 and perhaps beyond, is all part of that plan.

So when somebody tells you that Adu is being a brat, be sure to laugh them off. In fact, there's nothing about this dispute that's childish at all.

UPDATE: Dave from DCenters sent in some thoughts via email:

I think your fear that Freddy might bolt for England or another team is misplaced, as Freddy has repeatedly gone on record as saying he wants to play for the US, to the point of spurning a chance to play for Ghana which qualified this year. Your other comments are interesting, especially in terms of the Lalas situation. The issue is playing time now, both to expose himself to a potential Nats call-up but also to showcase his talent for an EPL team.

He's going to the EPL at some point in the next few years, the question is how much PT he gets before he goes. He'll get more in the swamp certainly.

I'm not really afraid that Adu might bolt, but I think it's on the minds of USSF and Bruce Arena. Sure, he's been making all the right noises about playing for the USA, but all it takes is a few years at Man. U, Liverpool or Arsenal, and he might be ready to bolt.

After all, it's hard to argue that his commercial opportunties as a Soccer player would be better in the US than anywhere in Europe.

In my mind, it's all about the threat, as it may never have to be exercised in order to be effective.

Here's a question I'm not sure I have the answer to: Is there any side in MLS who would have used Adu as much or less than D.C. United? I suspect that answer is no, and Team Adu is well aware that's the case. Certainly Lalas seems to think he could use Adu more often. And I'm sure the league would absolutely die to have him in New York.

I think the bottom line here is that MLS and the USSF need Adu a lot more than he needs them. Indeed, in time, Adu could become the face of American soccer, and that would be all to the good. But Adu, and more likely his advisors, might very well have other plans -- or at least let people think that they might.

ANOTHER UPDATE: DCenters has a followup answer to my last question:

As for "are there any clubs that would play Freddy as little or less than DCU?" I can think of two or three. Freddy is a center attacking mid, maybe a forward. New England is deep at those positions (Noonan/Twellman/Dempsey) and San Jose has likely MVP candidate Dwane DeResario at CAM. So for those two clubs he'd be fighting for time. Ditto in Los Angeles with Hurculez Gomez and Landon Donovan, although he might break in uptop. New York, FC Dallas, Chicago, Salt Lake, Chivas, Kansas City, Columbus and Colorado all would probably play Freddy more, not just for talent but for the draw at the gate. The question is do they have anything that DCU would be willing to trade Freddy for, aside from an international allocation.

Something tells me that if the situation for Adu in D.C. can't be salvaged -- and I think that's entirely up to Adu's handlers at this point -- the league will do what it needs to do in order to get him playing time somewhere else. And that will be the case even if D.C. has to take a bath in terms of trade value (not like that didn't happen when Landon Donovan said he didn't want to return to San Jose, now did it?).

For more on the Adu situation, click here.